| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Ok, I see that four people are really committed to keeping this discussion in the realm of make-believe even for internet spaceships. Four? I hope you're not including me in that number. I'm trying to make the same poi...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.20 11:30:00
|
162. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Hexxx wrote: One of the very important points in talking about risk management is the difference between possible and probable. Right now, today, as we speak, it is possible that your Bank in RL could experience fraud. Collusion is all it take...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.20 10:40:00
|
163. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Hexxx wrote: Absolutely, but unless you're writing everything to two separate databases or making full backups every 5 minutes and retaining all of them....it's possible. You manage the risk by restricting who has direct access to the database...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.20 09:30:00
|
164. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
FFS Jake! I had work to do. Darth Tickles wrote: Fortunately the entire topic is moot, as unsecured loans have gone from rare to almost non-existent over the last few months, and are soon to be completely phased out as an institution as the l...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 21:48:00
|
165. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Oh dear god no! Don't push that button!!! Darth's views are on record if you evesearch his alt Elise Darkstar. But please ... for the love of god ... edit your post. Quick now! We've already had one lucky escape with Utumetsu.
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 21:23:00
|
166. MD Borrower Credit Ratings - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake Andarius wrote: It seems a bit more fair to only count the face value of IPOs, but it does come at the expense of not really giving full credit to people like TornSoul who have literally worked years on a successful IPO. It is a trade-off...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 21:19:00
|
167. MD Borrower Credit Ratings - in Market Discussions [original thread]
TornSoul wrote: Jake Andarius wrote: The only problem is, it would be a massive undertaking to compile all the links to the individual lotteries. I think I will put that on the backburner for a bit. I might summon up the energy one of these...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 20:54:00
|
168. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Utemetsu wrote: Considering I'm not nearly as clever as you are, mind enlightening me in this regard? It has nothing to do with some non-existent absolute ordering of intelligence, it's merely experience. I've seen t...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 18:26:00
|
169. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Kara Roideater wrote: I'm gonna call bullshit on that. If you actually cared about results you would engage with people in the way most likely to influence their actions. Instead you opt to engage with them in such a way...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 18:08:00
|
170. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: I care about results, you care about...spaceships forums reputations or something? I don't even know... You were the guys cooing about the inherent value of ideas...now you're crying because people aren't following what ...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 17:54:00
|
171. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: I read up to the point where you shared your completely uninformed version of what happened to ebank, and then i stopped reading That's good because if you made it two paragraphs further things would have really got ugly.
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 17:00:00
|
172. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: ROFL those are all terrible ideas except #4 they betray both a juvenile understanding of the nature of interactions in Eve and complete lack of awareness of what has been tried before in terms of financial institutions i...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 16:50:00
|
173. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake, in order for Darth to understand that you have shot down an idea you must also insult the person who forwarded said idea. Strange, I know, but it's just how his hearing works. Seriously, though, it is well worth remembering how badly wrong ...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 16:37:00
|
174. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Hexxx wrote: Mara Villoso wrote: Sentence preceding the one quoted in the OP: "The velocity of money falls steeply and steadily from the start of the graph, January 2007, until late 2008 . This is happening at a time when the money supp...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 14:58:00
|
175. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Utemetsu wrote: Since CCP is out of the question in terms of oversight, you turn to trusted third parties. Like Cosmoray, Bad Bobby and the chaps who set up EBANK and ran it so flawlessly? I can see this working. Edit - Apologies for th...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.19 14:30:00
|
176. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I have my doubts about this as I'm not convinced that there is sufficient demand for borrowing that can be matched with lender expectations of security to have anything more than a microscopic effect on the speed money moves. My experience lending...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.18 21:27:00
|
177. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
@Jake I think what we need to do here is understand that there are two distinct but overlapping economies that we can talk about, as that will help us to avoid some confusions that are coming in on both sides of the debate from using overly monoli...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.18 20:59:00
|
178. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Adunh Slavy wrote: P.S. TQ go down? Can't send mail through the eve-gate Yeah - is down at the mo.
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.18 15:40:00
|
179. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Adunh Slavy wrote: Maybe part of the answer is to create a banking alliance. The only purpose is to loan money and enforce payment with guns and grief. There aren't enough guns and grief in all of eve to enforce payments of debts. I've got ...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.18 15:34:00
|
180. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Florestan Bronstein wrote: Kara Roideater wrote: You are correct that private banks don't print money. What they do is, effectively, write promissary notes for the additional 800mil, with that promissary note in turn backed by the asset they...
- by Kara Roideater - at 2012.03.18 15:22:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |